{"id":2627,"date":"2018-08-01T10:22:49","date_gmt":"2018-08-01T08:22:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/CJ\/?p=2627"},"modified":"2018-08-01T10:22:49","modified_gmt":"2018-08-01T08:22:49","slug":"la-justice-rend-ses-verdicts-a-libreville","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/la-justice-rend-ses-verdicts-a-libreville\/","title":{"rendered":"La justice rend ses verdicts \u00e0 Libreville"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal de Libreville \u00e9tait attendu depuis plusieurs mois pour se prononcer sur les nombreuses affaires qui ont d\u00e9fray\u00e9 la chronique dans le domaine des Eaux et for\u00eats\u00a0: exploitation foresti\u00e8re ill\u00e9gale, braconnage, trafic d\u2019esp\u00e8ces prot\u00e9g\u00e9es, corruption et autres. En ce qui concerne la faune, les d\u00e9cisions de justice ont \u00e9t\u00e9 mitig\u00e9es, voire peu dissuasives avec principalement \u00a0d\u00e9cisions de trois mois de prison ferme. Dans le domaine du bois, les d\u00e9bats ont \u00e9t\u00e9 particuli\u00e8rement houleux et donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 d\u2019importants dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/CJ\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/WP_20180503_13_43_59_Pro11.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-2519\" src=\"http:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/CJ\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/WP_20180503_13_43_59_Pro11-300x169.jpg\" alt=\"WP_20180503_13_43_59_Pro(1)\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Le Tribunal de Libreville \u00e9tait attendu depuis plusieurs mois pour se prononcer sur les nombreuses affaires qui ont d\u00e9fray\u00e9 la chronique dans le domaine des Eaux et for\u00eats\u00a0: exploitation foresti\u00e8re ill\u00e9gale, braconnage, trafic d\u2019esp\u00e8ces prot\u00e9g\u00e9es, corruption et autres. En ce qui concerne la faune, les d\u00e9cisions de justice ont \u00e9t\u00e9 mitig\u00e9es, voire peu dissuasives avec [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1133,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-non-classifiee"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2627\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservation-justice.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}